« NSSF and NRA Already Have the Programs | Main | NSSF to Attend Gun Blogger Rendezvous »

September 04, 2009

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a0105351ed634970c0120a59ff70c970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Two Major Newspapers, Which One Got It Right?:

Comments

Justthenews

What does it mean when someone converts an Uzi from "semi-automatic" to "full auto"? Is it not possible to convert semi-automatic weapons to full auto? I know it is illegal to purchase a fully automatic weapon, but isn't it possible for criminals to convert semi-automatic weapons to fully automatic ones? (Please remember, criminals don't care about the legality of these weapons.) Also, this incident happened in Mexico. What does a law passed in 1934 in the USA have to do with Mexico?

Since you are offering to help reporters, I think it might help if you could answer the questions above. Also, what does "illegally modified" mean to you?

flockofone

Justthenews:

1)That depends. (on whether it is a legal conversion)
2)That depends. (on what weapon is attempting to be converted)
3)You are wrong it is not illegal, and that depends. (see number 2 above)
4)Nothing.

Also 5)It only matters what it means to those who enforce the "illegallity".

Scott

To Justthenews- Any semi auto firearm that fires from an open bolt (1928 Thompson, Uzi, Mac, and others) is since 1986 considered a machine gun by the ATF because they are fairly easy to convert to full auto fire. It is quite a bit more complicated to convert an AR or semi auto AK variant or any of the other semi automatic firearms designed to fire from a closed bolt. It usually requires multiple machining operations as well as modifications to the receiver of the firearm.
What the 1934 NFA has to do with it is that the NFA created a tax stamp for machine guns, short barreled rifles and shotguns, suppressors and destructive devices. In 1968 a registry of these items was created as well as barring interstate sales of handguns, the purchase of firearms by mail unless you are an FFL or own a C&R license. This means Title II firearms (full auto) are easily traced by the ATF because they have the names of the legal owners of all 217,000 weapons of that classification. Anyone who sold a machine gun to a Mexican citizen who then got it confiscated by the Mexican government is going to be in a world of hurt. There has been one instance of a registered machine gun being used in a crime since 1934 and that was committed by a cop.
Illegally modified means a firearm that violates any of the many regulations on the ATF books. A couple easy examples, a rifle with a barrel of under 16" or an overall length less than 26" or a shotgun with a barrel under 18" in length. Another example would be a pistol with a buttstock because that turns it into a SBR. HTH and that I didn't make any mistakes. A couple websites with lots of info would be thefiringline.com and thehighroad.us they are often willing to answer questions from the uninitiated. They also have pretty high moderation standards so you are unlikely to be flamed for being a member of the MSM.

Scott

Oh I forgot, it is not illegal to possess a fully automatic weapon in most states, just amazingly expensive and frustrating. There is a fixed supply of those firearms since the registry was closed in 1986 that has made prices go through the roof. A transferable Sten a firearm that cost at the outside $10.00 to make now goes for several thousand. A M16 will run 8 to 16 grand to own, a registered sear (the main component necessary for full auto)for an M16 is on average 10K. The frustrating part is that one must submit to a background check by the FBI complete with fingerprinting, get the approval of your local sheriff or other LEO agency and wait anywhere from 3 to 6 months to take possession after paying for the item oh and a $200.00 dollar tax stamp. The paperwork must accompany you anytime you are transporting or shooting it, if you plan on traveling interstate you must get prior approval from the ATF and make sure your route doesn't go through a state that bans possession of the item. The NFA of 1934 did exactly what it was meant to do which is discourage civilian ownership of military grade firearms with the GCA of 1968 and FOPA of 1986 further restricting the right to keep and bear arms.

md

Let's carry this a bit further.

Actually someone with the time, machining equipment and design capability could conceivably convert many manually-operated firearms, including flintlocks, into a semi or fully-automatic device. John M. Browning, as I've seen a drawing, had a "Rube Goldberg" setup for a lever action Winchester Model 94 - perhaps America's most famed deer rifle.

As far as that goes, such a skilled person might also make a firearm out of thousands of metal toy truck designs.

However, the legalities involved are daunting. In fact, from a machinist's perspective, it might well be far easier to manufacture a full-auto arm from scratch than to make conversions from even many semi-automatic arms.

It seems, however, that non governmental institutions, legal or otherwise as perceived by governments, prefer to acquire manufactured arms that fit their inclinations rather than to manufacture their own.

Gary Brennan

"ACTION, AUTOMATIC
A firearm that loads, fires and ejects cartridges continually as long as the trigger is depressed and there are cartridges available in the feeding system"

Only open bolt designed machine guns will load prior to firing. M16 type machine guns must have a round chambered to get the sequence moving. The same for most Semi-Automatic weapons

Jim Stell

I don't think the MSM cares about whether their terminology is accurate, only that it is inflammatory. The first time we let them get away with calling a simple semi-auto an "assault rifle", we lost Round One. Look at CNN's Aug18 coverage of the protest in Phoenix; MSM's definition is "Black & Ugly = Assault Rifle"

Spitter

I have to agree that accuracy is not MSM's highest priority, its what makes for "good" copy that gets a thumbs up!

However, in our own industry, we are to blame. We talk about "weapons", "semi-automatic" firearms... the public at-large cannot dsitinguish the difference, we have to offer better "word-choices" when talking about firearms.

If we are serious about correcting things, we need to proactively fight back, politely embarrassing media who are known to be hostile - continously using incorrect terminology, while nurturing friendly media - fixing inadvertent flaws in their articles.

Old adage fight - fire with fire... no one wants to appear ignorant, possibly losing more print or TV audience... media is suffering while folks like FOX are on the rise.

Cortaflex

Is this a trick question? None of them got it right - they are newspapers!

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment